by Ted
(zip 47802)
Nice looking phone. I had a Moto 170 before and wanted one with a camera.
The camera is not much good, and now I am charged 30 sec. for receiving and sending text, I believe because I have only used text once and received one. I do believe it said 30 sec. where I was only using 18 sec. to send and 0 to receive with the moto.
The LG 600 is thinner, slick, harder to hang on to, hard to open and easy to drop. That's no good.
If I had double min. free on my old Moto 170, I would go back to it in a min. I might even go for the Moto 370 which I believe I can get for $30 with double min.
Believe me "Thinner is not better" I really do hate it. I really wouldn't want Tracfone to make money selling me another phone just because they sell one that has a lot of faults.
Also, whoever thinks that the phone works in my zip code is mistaken. That's about the only place it don't work.
But it sure is pretty.
I hate it.
I almost forgot--Phone didn't work for hours and hours with talking to a tech. Always had the same answer that never worked and after several days and many frustrating hours, they sent me a new sim card and now it works fairly well.
Things aren't as convenient on the LG as the Moto.
But it sure is pretty. I hate it.
Comments for Sure is pretty. I hate it.
|
||
|
||